Saturday 2 October 2021
Thoughtful Questioning: Why Cold Call Is Not Enough
Wednesday 11 November 2020
What The Headlines Didn't Tell You About Ofsted's Latest Covid-19 Report
Here’s what, if you haven’t read the full report, you
probably don’t yet know: some children have been more exposed to domestic
violence, there has been a rise in self-harm and some children have become more
involved in crime. But those are just some of the most concerning, negative
outcomes of the pandemic for some young people.
Here’s what else you might not know, according to Ofsted:
the vast majority of children have settled back into school, are being taught a
broad curriculum and leaders and teachers are doing an excellent job of
adapting necessarily with positive results.
But that sort of stuff does not a headline make, does it?
Wellbeing
When it comes to wellbeing of pupils, the report is clear:
‘leaders said that their pupils were generally happy to be back, and had
settled in well.’
The report also records that ‘leaders in most schools
continued to report that pupils were happy to be back. Pupils were described as
confident, resilient, calm and eager to learn. There was a general sense that
they appreciate school and each other more. Many leaders noticed that behaviour
has generally improved… Many emphasised that fewer pupils were needing
additional support than had been anticipated.’
Imagine the headlines we could have had: Pupils return to school with confidence and
resilience! Children eager to learn as they get back to school! Students defy
expectations in calm return to education!
In addition, Ofsted identify that schools are going above
and beyond in their response to ensure that pupils are happy and able to deal
with the changes the pandemic has brought: ‘Many schools of all types reported
a greater focus than usual on their personal, social and health education
(PSHE) curriculum to develop aspects such as resilience and independence and to
reinforce or improve learning behaviours, but also to address pupils’
anxieties. Some schools were also strengthening their PE provision to support
pupils’ physical and mental well-being.’
And it’s not only children who have got back to school and
got on with doing a great job, it’s the staff too, according to the report: ‘Leaders
said that their staff have generally adapted well to various changes, and are
working hard to make these work. They attributed this to frequent and effective
communication with staff as well as to a stronger sense of team spirit that has
emerged over the last few months.’
Further potential headlines for your delectation: School staff working hard to adapt to
changes! Strong sense of team spirit seen in schools!
And perhaps being at home hasn’t been such a bad thing for
children anyway; perhaps it isn’t just the fact that they are finally back at
school which has made for such positive changes: ‘Many leaders spoke positively
about pupils with SEND returning to school. In a couple of schools, leaders
noted that additional time spent at home had been positive for pupils with
SEND, who had returned with confidence.’
Attendance
One of the fears of school leaders in the summer was most
certainly around what attendance would look like come September. Fears have
been allayed, according to Ofsted’s report: ‘Around three quarters of the
schools visited reported having attendance that was similar to, or higher than,
this time last year… where attendance had improved, leaders often attributed this
to the work that they had done to build families’ trust during the first
national lockdown, and their continued efforts to inform and reassure parents
about the arrangements they had made to keep pupils safe in school.’
More headlines: Home-school
relationships improve: attendance rises! 2020 Attendance higher than ever!
And Ofsted even acknowledge just how thoughtful and flexible
school leaders are being in their commitment to children: ‘Leaders described
how they were working closely with parents and offering flexible arrangements
if these were needed to help pupils to return as soon as possible.’
Curriculum and Remote Learning
Much was said during lockdown regarding ‘gaps’ that would
appear in learning. I’m sure many school leaders considered whether or not to
slim down their curriculum, providing what might amount to an insubstantial
education which did not develop the whole child.
However, what Ofsted have seen is that leaders are ambitious
to return their schools to their usual full curriculum as soon as possible,
that most of the secondary schools were teaching all their usual subjects and
that many of the primary schools they visited were teaching all subjects.
Another favourite subject of lockdown discussion and thought
was remote learning. Public figures weighed in with their ideas, as did
parents, teachers and students. Would schools be able to truly provide remote
education to a suitable standard?
Well, Ofsted have found that ‘almost all schools were either
providing remote learning to pupils who were self-isolating or said that they
were ready to do so if needed’ and that most schools ‘were monitoring pupils’
access to the work provided or attendance at the remote lesson.’
They also report that leaders are responding well to their
findings, particularly that ‘during the first national lockdown, pupils reacted
very positively when there was live contact from teachers, so want to build on
that when needed.’
And again, leaders are adapting well to the new
circumstances, thinking outside of the box and ensuring that staff wellbeing is
a priority: ‘Leaders in a few schools explained how they were trying to
mitigate the additional demands on staff of providing remote learning, for
example through the help of teaching assistants, or having staff who took a
particular role in leading or modelling remote education.’
A further possible headline: Schools found to be providing full curriculum and good remote learning!
CPD
Remember how teachers were all lazy during lockdown and
should have been back at work? Well, turns out, they were actually working
really hard (surprise, surprise), not only providing aforementioned remote
learning but also taking the opportunity to sharpen their skills en masse: ‘staff
in many schools seized the opportunity for training and development during the
months when most pupils were not physically in school.’
Now that certainly won’t make the headlines: Teachers work hard despite perception of
journalists!
Learning ‘Loss’
And finally to the big one: have children fallen behind? Are
their gaps in their learning? Academically, has Covid-19 set children behind
where they should be?
Well, much is said in the report regarding this, however a
key takeaway should certainly be the following:
‘In the mainstream schools visited, there was no real
consensus about the extent of pupils’ learning loss as a result of the
disruption to their education.’
Correct headline: No
consensus on Covid learning loss!
This is where the main criticism of the report might come:
it is written in such a way that the negative is the focus.
For example, the report makes it clear that ‘some leaders commented that writing was also an issue for some pupils, including writing at length, spelling, grammar,
presentation, punctuation and handwriting.’ And it is this that then hits the
headlines, with the ‘some’ removed, of course. Such a statement becomes
‘Children forget how to write during lockdown’ when it is headlinified.
Indeed, the inverse statement surely is equally as true: ‘Most leaders commented that writing wasn’t an issue for most pupils, including
writing at length, spelling, grammar, presentation, punctuation and
handwriting’ or even ‘Most leaders
didn’t comment on writing being an issue for most children.’
Yes, it is right for schools to identify the negative impact
of the pandemic so as to make progress with children who have been affected,
but at the same time the positive impacts and the huge amount of work that has
already been done in this vein should surely be celebrated more widely.
Not just for the benefit of hardworking school staff either – as a parent I want to be reassured by both Ofsted and the media that schools are doing a great job with my children. Thankfully, I don’t have to rely on them to form my opinion: I know for certain my children’s school is doing a fantastic job, and I know the school I work in is too.
Tuesday 8 September 2020
Questions To Guide Teacher Reflection
Friday 19 June 2020
Back to School: Recovery or Catch Up?
We’ve been hearing a lot of talk about recovery with regards to the curriculum we teach when schools can eventually reopen to all children.
But the question must be asked, what are we trying to recover?
Are we trying to re-cover past material to ensure that it is secure? Are we trying to recover normality and perhaps just try to ignore this blip? Are we trying to help staff and children to recover mentally from the upheaval - similar to how a hospital patient might need to recover? Are we talking of something akin to roadside recovery where we fix a problem and send them on their way, give them a tow to get them to a destination or just give them a jump start?
Maybe we need to attempt to do all of these and more.
But the recent talk of ‘catch up’ does not help us to do any of the above.
When we normally think of catch up we think of small groups of children taking part in an intensive burst of input over a short amount of time - indeed, research shows that this is exactly how catch up interventions should be run so that they have maximum impact.
Can this be replicated for whole classes of children, some of whom will have been doing very little at home, others of whom may have followed all the home learning set and really prospered from that? We certainly need, as ever, an individualised, responsive approach for each child, but it is fairly certain that when we are all back in school we will be ‘behind’ where we normally would be, even if it means everyone is equally behind.
It would be foolish to think that by the end of the first term we will have caught up and will be able to continue as we were back in February and March. To believe this surely puts us on very shaky ground. Any kind of intensive approach to recovery is almost certain to negative repercussions, not least where children’s well-being is concerned - and that of staff, for that matter.
Year after year we hear stories from teachers escaping toxic schools and even leaving the profession who speak out on the hothousing, cramming, cheating, off-rolling, flattening the grass, and other morally bankrupt practices that go on in schools in the name of ‘getting good results’.
Well, back to my question: what are we trying to recover? How do we define ‘good results’? What result are we wanting from that first term back? That second term back? That third term?
How long are we willing to give this? We don’t know how long this will impact learning for - we’ve never had a period this long without children learning in classrooms. Perhaps it will barely leave a mark academically, perhaps the effects of it will be with us for years? Maybe we are overstating the potential impact on mental health and once we are back everyone will just be happy to be there, but maybe it will effect some of us for a good while yet.
What’s for sure, at least in my mind, is that we need a slow, blended approach to recovery. We must focus on the academic but we must not neglect everything else - bear in mind that phrase ‘the whole child’ and extend that to ‘the whole person’ so that it takes in all the people who will be working in schools when we can finally open properly to all.
We can not revert back to a system cowed by accountability - arranged around statutory assessment. Maybe they will scrap SATS this year, or edit the content that children will be tested on. Then again, maybe they won’t. Either way, schools - leaders and teachers - need to be brave enough to stand up for what is right for their children.
Ideally, we’d have an education department who, instead of telling us that modelling and feedback are the ideal way to teach, were willing to consult the profession in order to create a system-wide interim framework. A slimmed-down curriculum outlining the essentials and cutting some of the extraneous stuff from the Maths and English curriculum. Many schools are doing this piece of work so it would make sense if we were all singing off the same hymn sheet. If this was provided by the DfE then any statutory tests could be adapted accordingly - but this is the bluest of blue sky thinking.
And in suggesting that we limit the core subject curricula, I am certainly not suggesting that the whole curriculum is narrowed. Children will need the depth and breadth more than ever. We mustn’t let all the gained ground in terms of the wider curriculum be lost. We need the arts - I surely don’t even need to remind of the mental health benefits of partaking in creative endeavours. History and Geography learning is equally as valid (especially as they are the most interesting and captivating parts of the curriculum - fact): these must not fall victim to a curriculum narrowing which focuses solely on getting to children to ‘where they should’ be in Maths and English.
Who is to say, in 2020/2021, Post-Covid19, where a child ‘should be’? Perhaps we need to define this, or perhaps it’s not something we can even put our finger on.
I’m sure that if Lord Adonis read this I’d run the risk of becoming another of his apologists for failure, but that’s not what I am. What I am is an optimistic realist who wants the best for the children returning to our schools and the staff teaching them. What I am is someone who has observed the UK education system over a number of years and have seen schools who really run the risk of falling for rhetoric and accountability that leads to practice which does not best serve their key stakeholders. What I am is someone who is committed to getting all children back to school, back to work even, as quickly as is safely possible. I am a leader who is committed to the highest of standards but who won’t take shortcuts to get there.
When it comes to success(ful recovery) there are no shortcuts.
Some important other reads:
http://daisi.education/learning-loss/ - Learning Loss from Daisi Education (Data, Analysis & Insight for School Improvement)
https://www.adoptionuk.org/blog/the-myth-of-catching-up-after-covid-19 - The myth of ‘catching up’ after Covid-19 by Rebecca Brooks of Adoption UK
https://researchschool.org.uk/unity/news/canaries-down-the-coalmine-what-next-for-pupil-premium-strategy/ - Canaries Down the Coalmine: What Next for Pupil Premium Strategy? by Marc Rowland - Unity Pupil Premium Adviser
Thursday 12 December 2019
Beware The Reverse-Engineered Curriculum (or The Potential Pitfalls Of Going For Retrieval Practice Pell-Mell)
Wednesday 24 July 2019
Planning For Learning Sequences (Instead Of Planning Lessons)
Monday 9 July 2018
Using Mnemonics For Retrieval Practice
Monday 11 June 2018
No-Quiz Retrieval Practice Techniques
Monday 28 May 2018
Why Primary Teachers Need To Know About Metacognition
‘…with a large body of international evidence telling us that when properly embedded these approaches are powerful levers for boosting learning, it’s clear that we need to spend time looking at how to do this well.’
And if the focus here is on embedding and spending time on metacognitive approaches then there are surely strong implications for primary schools. In order for these learning habits (which research says are highly effective) to be embedded, we who are involved in primary education should be thinking about our role in their early development.
Continue reading here: https://bradford.researchschool.org.uk/2018/05/28/metacognition-in-primary/
The EEF's Metacognition and Self-Regulation guidance report can be downloaded here: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/tools/guidance-reports/metacognition-and-self-regulated-learning/
Thursday 19 October 2017
Poster: What To Say Instead of I Don't Know
The poster and a Word document containing the text can be downloaded here.
Wednesday 28 June 2017
Using 100% Sheets (AKA Knowledge Organisers) In Primary
Monday 5 June 2017
From The @TES Blog: Ten Ways To Maximise Learning Time In Lessons
Every teacher wants to make the most of the time children spend sitting in their classroom. And by "making the most of" I mean that we want them to be learning.